officialstreetpreachers Subscribe
Published: June 27, 2022

Supreme Court Upholds Religious Rights, Vindicates Football Coach Who Was Fired for Praying

By The Editor

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Monday morning in favor of a Washington state high school football coach who was fired from his job for silently praying on the field after games. 

SCOTUS Blog tweeted, “SCOTUS sides with a high school football coach in a First Amendment case about prayer at the 50-yard-line. In a 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS says the public school district violated the coach’s free speech and free exercise rights when it barred him from praying on the field after games.”

CLICK HERE to read the RULING

Coach Joe Kennedy has been battling the Bremerton School District since 2015. The district claimed that his actions violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. But the high court ruled that Bremerton School District violated Coach Kennedy’s First Amendment rights.

Christians, Churches and Pregnancy Clinics Now Ground Zero in Abortion Fight – Listen to the latest episode of CBN’s Quick Start Podcast:

The case stated, “The Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect an individual engaging in a personal religious observance from government reprisal; the Constitution neither mandates nor permits the government to suppress such religious expression.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority, “The Constitution and the best of our traditions counsel mutual respect and tolerance, not censorship and suppression, for religious and nonreligious views alike.”

The court declared a victory for Coach Kenney’s constitutional rights and admonished the local government for trying to punish him for his religious expression:

“Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic—whether those expressions take place in a sanctuary or on a field, and whether they manifest through the spoken word or a bowed head.”

“Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance doubly protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment. And the only meaningful justification the government offered for its reprisal rested on a mistaken view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination.” 

BREAKING… 

RECENT COVERAGE: Case of Football Coach Who Was Fired for Silently Praying on Field

The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at CBN


Share this Article

Download the Mobile App.
Exit mobile version