officialstreetpreachers Subscribe
Published: December 11, 2017

U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear gay ‘spousal’ benefits case

By The Editor

Pro-traditional marriage activists march to the Supreme Court at the annual March for Marriage in Washington D.C. on March 26, 2013.

WASHINGTON, D.C., December 11, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – Texas businesses will not be forced to give spousal benefits to employees in same-sex “marriages” after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the issue.

The city of Houston, Texas, sought to overturn a state Supreme Court ruling allowing for the elimination of spousal insurance benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees, but the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear their appeal.

The Texas court had ruled in June that while the Supreme Court’s Obergefell decision required states to recognize same-sex “marriage,” the high court “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons.” 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton summed up the meaning of the court’s decision at the time, saying, “While the U.S. Supreme Court declared a right to same-sex marriage, that ruling did not resolve all legal issues related to marriage.” 

The ruling was “a huge win for Houston taxpayers and for those who support the state’s marriage laws,” added Jonathan Saenz, president of Texas Values.  “We are not

The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at LifeSite News

The views expressed in this news alert by the author do not directly represent that of The Official Street Preachers or its editors


Share this Article

Download the Mobile App.
Exit mobile version