Tue Jul 26, 2022 – 12:24 pm EDTTue Jul 26, 2022 – 12:25 pm EDT
(WND News Center) – A lawsuit that could reveal many of the details of the Democrats’ scheme to create a Russia collusion claim to be used to damage then-candidate Donald Trump, a now-debunked conspiracy that they continued even after he was in the White House, has taken an abrupt turn.
A judge has refused to dismiss it, suggesting the defendant in the defamation claim “may have made clear mis-statements to the FBI” and might be responsible for “falsehoods” told about the plaintiff.
WND reported recently that the case was brought by Svetlana Lokhova against Stefan Halper, a British academic and long-time “confidential human source” for the FBI.
The case had been dismissed, but was returned by active status by an appeals court, prompting Just the News to suggest, “If the case proceeds to discovery or trial, it is likely to renew scrutiny about the weakness of evidence the FBI used to justify investigating Trump, his campaign, and his business associates for alleged collusion with Russia. No such collusion was ever found.”
Now Margot Cleveland at The Federalist has reported that in refusing to dismiss the case,
The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at LifeSite News
The views expressed in this news alert by the author do not directly represent that of The Official Street Preachers or its editors
