Fri Jan 27, 2023 – 11:35 am ESTFri Jan 27, 2023 – 11:47 am EST
This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
(Children’s Health Defense) — A federal judge in California on Wednesday granted Children’s Health Defense–California Chapter’s request for a preliminary injunction to block a California law that would have allowed the state’s medical boards to punish doctors for spreading “COVID-19 misinformation.”
In his 30-page opinion, Senior U.S. District Judge William Shubb determined the defendants in the case – California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and California Medical and Osteopathic Boards – provided “no evidence that ‘scientific consensus’ has any established technical meaning,” and that the law provides “no clarity” on the meaning of the word “misinformation.”
READ: Bill Gates admits COVID shots don’t prevent infection, protect vulnerable groups
Judge Shubb also found the “plaintiffs have established a likelihood of success on the grounds of their Fourteenth Amendment vagueness challenges.”
The ruling pertains to a lawsuit filed December 1, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California on behalf of plaintiffs CHD-California Chapter, Dr. LeTrinh Hoang and Physicians for Informed Consent.
The lawsuit was filed after Newsom, on September 30, 2022,
The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at LifeSite News
The views expressed in this news alert by the author do not directly represent that of The Official Street Preachers or its editors
