Fri Jul 1, 2022 – 3:50 pm EDT
LifeSiteNews is on the cutting edge of life and family news reporting. Support our Summer Campaign by giving a gift of support today: give.lifesitenews.com
(LifeSiteNews) — The lead author of a highly acclaimed peer-reviewed study which demonstrated the dangerous nature of experimental COVID-19 inoculations has decried the corruption of academia following his paper’s curious retraction.
“Academia is broken,” Dr. Ronald Kostoff told LifeSiteNews in an email interview. They are “the worst offender of all the stakeholders… because they know better, and still promote the mandating of these highly toxic substances.”
Kostoff, an aerospace scientist who has published over 200 peer-reviewed articles, was the first author of a study titled “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” The paper was part of a special September 14, 2021 issue of the Elsevier journal Toxicology Reports (TR) focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic.
The authors analyzed the toxic effects of the experimental COVID-19 inoculations, the profound inadequacy of their clinical trials to ensure safety, and in evaluating the cost-benefit considerations, arrived at a jarring conclusion in stark contrast to the general narrative:
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the
The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at LifeSite News
The views expressed in this news alert by the author do not directly represent that of The Official Street Preachers or its editors
