The physical foundation for which the world was built has been the patriarchal family. However, like never before, that very structure, the backbone of a prosperous society is under assault.
From every angle, key influencers from all walks of life, mainly through the LGBT+ community, are attempting to wage a war of sorts on the family. The latest inflammatory remarks come from an Israeli Lawmaker by the name of Merav Michaeli, who is by no means afraid of controversy. She would like to see ‘The State’ permanently decide who is the parent of a child. As per the online version of the Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, Merav would like to see marriage ‘broken apart’ from parenthood and childbirth, so that we can supposedly discover that the best solution is to replace straight marriage with gay marriage.
According to Michaeli; “The core family as we know it, unfortunately, is the least safe place for children.” Her plan is to have the state intervene and formally replace birth parents with state-appointed parents. Karl Marx would be so proud. The full debate can be seen below with her remarks towards the family institution beginning around 15:00 minutes.
Michaeli claims that ‘the default option’ for marriage results in inherent inequality, and the only way to combat it is by replacing marriage between a man and a woman with same-sex marriage.
Is this where equality leads?
Unfortunately, this is not the first time such an atrocious idea has been mentioned, stretching back all the way to 1971, an official Homosexual Manifesto was published in London, and it outlined the entirety of where Michaeli’s, and others, plan to take the world…straight to a genderless dystopia.
Furthermore, as Haaretz journalist Carolina Landsmann points out; “Subsequently, in the name of progress, perhaps the primitive practice which served our forefathers will also come to an end. Babies will be born under ideal laboratory conditions, and only under state approval. The “biological advantage” of heterosexuals, namely their ability to reproduce, will be considered a violation of the equality principle of homosexuals. After all, how will the state be able to determine whether men or women meet the required standards for becoming parents as long as they are free to become pregnant without a license?”
In the name of equality, the agenda is clear, destroy the patriarchal family and rip to shreds all things naturally created by God.
Works Cited
Carolina Landsmann. “The Nuclear Family Threat.” Haaretz. . (2017): . .
“THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!
The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:
“THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…”
SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:
SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as
a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".says’. (6) Lit.,(footnotes) "(5). Lit.,
here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo)."
(footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."
ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.
SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"
SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."
(footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunctionto his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”
Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.” Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.” Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, therefore, be suspected.”
What is here is a shadow of what is to come. Both sexes are married to Jesus Spiritually. Both sexes will be married literally at the marriage supper of the lamb.
Leave it to a handful of Gays, Zionists, and Muslims to destroy Christian Values.
Yes, everyone is UNEQUAL, 2 men are unequal in height, strength. The baby is formed by sexually unequal so how is it bad to be raised by sexually unequal.
I remember when comedians joked about homosexuals, now they are preferred?
I think Christians should not have family. Look how many kids become atheist, satanist, homosexual. If we ARE in end times then why have family?
I agree with what you are saying about how we are all born unequal, it’s the difference between us that makes us unique. I see your point about not having a family.. But you forget that God says be fruitful and multiply. It’s been the End Times since the day Jesus rose from the Dead, which means we are still to be watchful and carry out His will for us on Earth here and now, in the moment, but always looking ahead and up at the incoming storm. However, we don’t know when that storm will arrive which is why we are still to carry on with our lives, spreading the good news as we go. The Bible says raise your children up in the way they should go and they won’t depart from it, so we need to raise children correctly against the ways of the world regardless of the period.
I have thought it unwise for Christians to have family. They can marry, work together for the Lord. If it’s end times?
It’s not unwise to have a family… Families built on the foundation of Christ is how we beat this
Nobody is born Christian. If it is endtimes, then we’re headed into lawlessness.
There’s a crisis with youth leaving churches. I read they turn to mysticism, satanist, occult, break their parents’ hearts.
It is prophesied that Christianity will dwindle, and we see it.
The man of lawlessness is being revealed.
Do you know what it’s like today for Christian teens? Lust, porn, homosexuals, bullies?
I believe it hurts more people.
Do you have statistics to show otherwise?
Good point, and I do not have statistics to show otherwise but what I do have is a comparison of how kids are raised now verses a few decades ago.. We can always just return to raising children the old way… Kids are handed to the community for their upbringing when it is the parents who should be doing the upbringing..
that is ridiculous what a foolish person